Rec center a costly onus to those who wouldn't use it
To the editor:
Based on the results from the Orange Township community recreation center survey (itself a $55,000 cost to the taxpayers), one-sixth of the 1,500 households surveyed favored having health club memberships subsidized by their neighbors (the study reports only 46 percent of the 559 survey respondents said they definitely would vote in favor of a tax increase for a rec center).
One of those seeking a handout, former township trustee Mark Robertson, said $96 a year for the bond issue is not too costly to homeowners. Maybe not to him, since he will be getting the benefit. But for those not planning to use the facility (the majority of the township), a $96 transfer from their wallets to Robertson's personal recreation fund is costly indeed.
Of course, Robertson could seek his handout directly by knocking on doors near his home, but such an approach exposes his aim. It is always much cleaner -- more sophisticated -- to have an issue placed on the ballot. That way he, and those also seeking a benefit at the expense of others, can position their gain as some sort of public good.